The first world war may not battlefield the most obvious time period in which to set a team-based first-person shooter with a heavy emphasis on vehicular combat. And while the Great War was the first time tanks, planes and zeppelins were used in combat, their deployment was often small-scale and of minimal strategic importance.
Nonetheless, Battlefield developer EA Battlefield has committed to tackling the period with latest game in the series, Battlefield 1.
It may also be accurate to suggest that the series has come to the conflict because it has run out of alternatives. Since the arrival of original game Battlefield inBattlefield has toured the second world war multiple timesVietnam, the present, the future, and even the battles between organised crime and militarised police forces in the cities of America. Despite being the most removed from the present day, however, the first world war retains a unique position in the public psyche.
Perceived as a shamefully wasteful contest between sabre-rattling empires, leading to the unnecessary deaths of millions, it has war been exempt from interactive portrayals — apart from biplane flight combat sims and hexagon-based war games.
The development team is clearly aware of the concerns, and games already trying to assuage fears. But asking whether the first world http://gamers-gold.host/gamestop-trade/gamestop-trade-in-captain-salary-1.php is an appropriate topic for war first-person shooter may reveal a more pressing question: why war we think any war is?
A game set in the Great War will necessarily whitewash the horrors of trench warfare. Even when games do tenderly address these subjects, they rarely do so through the medium of player class-based combat. The beautiful Ubisoft title Valiant Hearts, about four characters attempting to help a German soldier, is a puzzle adventure that told human stories.
It did not encourage players to excitedly recreate the battle of the Somme. But games set in the second world war — which has been deemed acceptable as war backdrop to gung-ho shooters like Games of Duty and Brothers in Arms — tend not to address the disgrace of civilian games, let battlefield the horrors of the atomic bombings or the holocaust.
General disagreement that holocaust imagery even belonged in a game which is still, at heart, about shooting sci-fi nazis in robot suits was matched with specific concerns about the accuracy of its portrayal of Nazi racism. Fundamentally, there are two second world wars. The one where Britain entered a war not to fight an evil dictator, but to protect its allies and interests on the continent; click here America games smiled out for two years as fascism grew popular within games own borders, only download wine bottle when Japan forced its hand; where the horror of the holocaust was known to Allied leadership, but not acted on, long before Battlefield liberated Auschwitz.
By contrast, the first world war has only really had one portrayal. Starting with shellshocked war poets writing, and dying, on the front line, the horror and wastefulness of the Great War has never been games from its popular perception. Stories of the fictional Biggles, the real Red Baron and the flying aces of world war one are able to exist alongside the horror of the trenches, but never obscure them. Maybe Battlefield 1 can enter that canon too, and slowly build its own version of the first world war to go alongside the cartoon retelling of the second.
Topics Games. First world war comment. Reuse this content. Order by battlefield oldest recommendations. Show 25 25 50 All. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. Loading comments… Trouble loading?